[LargeFormat] lightweight 300mm enlarging/copy/repro lens?
Jim Hemenway
largeformat@f32.net
Fri Mar 19 16:00:15 2004
Hi Michael:
I don't know enough about the specs of most lenses to give you a useful
answer. It was used as a process lens so I guess that it's indeed made
for 1:1. I had missed the 3:1 part of your message, sorry.
Jim
Michael Sullivan wrote:
> The Apo-Ronar -- that's ideal for 1:1, isn't it?
> I wonder how it will compare at 3:1 to an enlarging lens?
>
> mjs
>
>
>
> On Mar 19, 2004, at 2:10 PM, Jim Hemenway wrote:
>
>> Hi Michael:
>>
>> I have a Rodenstock Apo-Ronar-Cl 1:9 f 300 process lens if you're
>> interested.
>>
>> $110.00
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Jim Hemenway
>> Winchester, MA
>>
>> Michael Sullivan wrote:
>>
>>> Dear List,
>>> I'm in need of a lightweight enlarging/copy/repro lens in the 300m
>>> length.
>>> I currently own a Rodenstock Rodagon 300mm, but it is one heavy beast!!
>>> In comparison, my Apo-Nikkor 360mm weighs but a fraction.
>>> The ideal lens would be optimally used at 3:1 copying artwork.
>>> Any recommendations?
>>> Michael Sullivan
>>> THE PRINTWRIGHT STUDIO
>>> P.O. Box 552
>>> Marshfield Hills MA 02051
>>> 617.529.0603 cell
>>> http://www.haywood-sullivan.com/printwright
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Jim - http://www.hemenway.com
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> LargeFormat mailing list
>> LargeFormat@f32.net
>> http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/largeformat
>>
>>
> Michael Sullivan
> THE PRINTWRIGHT STUDIO
> P.O. Box 552
> Marshfield Hills MA 02051
> 617.529.0603 cell
> http://www.haywood-sullivan.com/printwright
>
>