[LargeFormat] Panatomic-X still around sort of...

Rich Lahrson largeformat@f32.net
Mon Aug 12 22:15:06 2002


Hi Les!

     Of the large roll of Panatomic-X I've got, I've only developed some that
was cut
to 3 1/4 x 4 1/4 that I shot in a Graflex SLR.  But it was a PITA to cut to
that size.
I'm getting the 5x7 soon and cutting the film will be easier.  Also, I
developeed in a tank.
But for the 5x7 I'll use the trays.  That's why I wrote to Kodak.  I was
hoping that
the film would be available on a thicker base to make life easier.

     It's interesting to hear that the Polaroid P/N may be Panatomic-X  But
it's only 4x5.
My decision to move to 5x7 will allow me to try some new materials.  Like
developing
in pyro and contact printing onto Azo.  Plus I've got an old Elwood 5x7 fitted
with
a Componon 180mm for larger.  The Polaroid P/N is a very fine grained film
I've used,
but not recently.

Rich Lahrson
Berkeley, California
tripspud@transbay.net

Les Newcomer wrote:

> What kind of time/temp and process?  jobo? tray?  With that thin of a
> base I suspect nitro burst in hangers is out of the question ;-)
>
> Les
> On Monday, August 12, 2002, at 04:29 PM, Mike Kirwan wrote:
>
> > Have you tried Polaroid Type 55 PN film? I think this a similar or if
> > not
> > the same emulsion as Panatomic-X. I have removed the film from the
> > envelope
> > and developed in D-76 with really good results.